Bonds from companies with ratings below BBB-minus are considered less safe, hence the market term “junk” or “high-yield”. They offer better yields to compensate for the higher default rate compared with “investment grade” companies.
Yet with investors believing the chief risk for bond markets at the moment is the tightening of monetary policy, those higher yields are seen as a buffer rather than a warning signal.
With the United States recording inflation above expectations recently, investors fret that the Federal Reserve may begin “tapering”, or unwinding, its money-printing.
“Fixed-rate investment grade bonds are very expensive and very tight and would be extremely sensitive to any concern from the markets on higher rates,” said Cosimo Marasciulo, head of investment absolute returns at Amundi, Europe’s largest asset manager. “There is absolutely no spread protection there,” he added, referring to the yield premiums the bonds carry versus government debt.
Indeed, Markit’s iBoxx index suite shows U.S. and European high-grade spreads at the tightest ever against government debt benchmarks. They tightened aggressively over the last 10 months after the Fed added them to its asset purchase scheme and the European Central Bank ramped up buying.
U.S. investment-grade bonds currently pay a 103 basis-point yield premium over Treasuries, a record low, according to Markit’s iBoxx index.
Junk bond funds, meanwhile, have enjoyed nine straight weeks of investment inflows, according to fund tracker EPFR, which also highlights six consecutive weeks of flows to dedicated exchange traded funds (ETFs).
The sector has generated year-to-date returns of more than 2%, while investment-grade debtholders have endured a 3.6% loss, ICE BofA indexes show.
Eight years ago, then Fed boss Ben Bernanke hinted at reducing, or tapering, the asset purchases first instituted in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis. The subsequent savage sell-off was dubbed the “taper tantrum”.
Now, U.S. President Joe Biden‘s $1.9 trillion spending plan and recent robust economic data have got markets betting the Fed will start scaling back asset purchases from early-2022.
The 2013 tantrum saw junk bonds suffer more than high-rated peers. This time the axe may fall more heavily on investment-grade debt for two reasons – tighter spreads and higher duration.
Duration, a function of how long creditors take to recoup their investment, is seen as a measure of how sensitive a bond’s price is to interest rate risk.
The easy-money years allowed companies to issue more long-maturity debt, boosting the average duration of U.S. investment-grade bonds to a near-record 7.7 years, versus 6.6 years in 2013.
Average junk debt duration meanwhile is 3.34 years, Markit iBoxx indexes show.
“The big cloud hanging over liquid markets is inflation-induced rate risk. We are very focused on rate volatility and the impact that has on bond markets, so we are underweight longer duration, fixed-rate investments,” said Joseph Moroney, co-head of global corporate credit at private equity heavyweight
Apollo is focusing instead on floating rate securities such as leveraged loans, where yields increase when rates rise. Moroney is also moving down the risk curve to single-B junk debt bonds, where average 4.6% yields surpass the overall junk index.
Junk bonds are of course risky; ratings agency S&P Global predicts default rates there at 7% by year-end, from 6.6% in December 2020. In contrast, defaults among investment grade firms are near-zero; even BBB-rated securities, the lowest investment grade rung, boast a historical 0.3% default rate.
Harry Richards, a fund manager for British money manager Jupiter touts a “barbell” approach – some government bond holdings “while closely exploring the riskier parts of the market, which still have decent carry and upside potential”.
Investment grade debt, he reckons, has fully priced any positive news so he has “been taking chips off the table”.
Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily Market Updates & Live Business News.
ETPrime stories of the day